review — Skills — getagentictools

What it does

The implementation plan from /architect if one exists

The feature description or task that was given

Any relevant context files — architecture boundaries, code standards, design rules

Every part of the feature description — is it all there?

The decisions made during planning — are they reflected in the code?

The scope — did the implementation stay within bounds or add things that were not asked for?

Code standards — naming conventions, file organisation, TypeScript strictness, error handling patterns — do they match what the project established?

Source

Repository: https://github.com/javascript-mastery-pro/skills

review FAQ

What does the review skill do?

After building a feature, verify it matches what was planned, respects the system architecture and design standards, and is ready for production. Reports issues clearly so the developer decides what to fix. The implementation plan from /architect if one exists The feature description or task that was given

What does review require?

This is where AI drift most commonly happens. The feature works, but it violates rules that the project depends on.

How do I install review?

Run: npx -y skills add https://github.com/javascript-mastery-pro/skills --skill review --agent claude-code — the source lives at github.com/javascript-mastery-pro/skills.

Maintain review?

Let people know it's listed here — add the badge (live metrics, light/dark aware) or a plain link to your README or docs.

[review on getagentictools](https://getagentictools.com/skills/javascript-mastery-pro-skills-review?ref=badge)

npx agentictools info skills/javascript-mastery-pro-skills-review

The second line is the CLI lookup for this page — handy in READMEs and docs.